Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2006-04-25 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2006-04-25 House Journal Page 3328 HB 384 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the April 24, 2006, calendar (page 3299), was read the third time: 2006-04-25 House Journal Page 3329 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 384(JUD) "An Act relating to fines for certain offenses involving aeronautics, shipment of animals, alcoholic beverages, boats, fish and game, health care records and public health, medical review organizations, public restroom facilities, smoking, shelter cabins, refrigerators and similar equipment, radiation sources, high voltage lines, child labor, employment in underground mines, marriage licenses, motor vehicles and driver's licenses, ignition interlock devices, pipelines, use of the state seal, and emissions requirements; relating to the maximum fine provided for violations and infractions and to the definition of 'minor offenses'; redesignating certain fish and game misdemeanor offenses as class A misdemeanors; amending Rule 8(b), Alaska District Court Rules of Criminal Procedure; and providing for an effective date." Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 384(JUD) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Berkowitz: Insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. _. Any contract relating to a common carrier gas pipeline shall have mandatory fines for failure to perform." Representative Berkowitz moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Anderson objected. Amendment to Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Croft: Delete "common carrier" Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment to Amendment No. 1 be adopted. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2006-04-25 House Journal Page 3330 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 384(JUD) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 as amended YEAS: 18 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Moses, Salmon, Weyhrauch, Wilson Nays: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Foster, Hawker, Holm, Kelly, Kohring, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas Absent: Gatto, Samuels And so, Amendment No. 1 as amended was not adopted. The question being: "Shall CSHB 384(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 384(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 37 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Crawford, Croft, Dahlstrom, Elkins, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Harris, Hawker, Holm, Joule, Kapsner, Kelly, Kerttula, Kott, LeDoux, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Moses, Neuman, Olson, Ramras, Rokeberg, Salmon, Seaton, Stoltze, Thomas, Weyhrauch, Wilson Nays: Kohring Absent: Gatto, Samuels And so, CSHB 384(JUD) passed the House. 2006-04-25 House Journal Page 3331 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 384(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.